The Reverend Ebenezer Aldred (1745-1822)An Obituary and some notes on Ebenezer Aldred, Unitarian Minister of Great Hucklow. Contributed by Malcolm Barton © Copyright 2007 The history of the Shirley Aldred & Company includes an invaluable short history of the Aldred family dating back to the seventeenth century. The earliest mentioned is a Jeremiah Aldred, a Dissenting Minister who preached a sermon at Manchester in commemoration of the victory at Prestonpans over James the Old Pretender's supporters on the first anniversary of the victory in November 1716. He died in 1729 at Monton near Eccles. His son, the Rev John Aldred M.A. a graduate of Glasgow University became minister of Westgate Chapel in Wakefield, married Mary Naylor daughter of a Wakefield merchant and died in 1760 at the age of 60 and was buried in the old chapel yard at Westgate End. But best known of these Dissenting ministers was his son Ebenezer because he took the unusual step of preaching of the coming of the end of the world from the middle of the River Thames in February 1812. Ebenezer was about fifteen when his father died. He became a mercer in Wakefield and is described as woollen draper and mercer in the Trade Directory of 1781 and as a mercer, draper and button manufacturer in the Trade Directory of 1784. He is recorded as paying his pew rent at Westgate Chapel in 1768 the earliest date recorded until 1794. He became a trustee of Westgate Chapel in July 1774 and he was still a trustee in 1812 when he was living at Great Hucklow. In October 1781 Ebenezer purchased some land adjoining Westgate Common on which by 1783 he built the first textile mill in the vicinity of Wakefield powered by a steam engine - probably a Savery type engine raising water to run a waterwheel. “Aldred engine” is referred to. The mill was insured in 1786 and when it was mortgaged in May 1787 it was described as “lately erected … for the purpose of Scribbling and Carding wool and Frizing of cloth”. The mortgage was taken over in 1793, and perhaps increased by James Milnes of Thornes House near Wakefield, a cloth merchant prince, sometime M.P. and also a member of the now Unitarian Westgate Chapel congregation. In April 1796 Milnes insured probably this mill, described as a scribbling mill going by water for a total of £600. James Milnes advanced Ebenezer £1,000 at 5%. The mill failed in the same year and a commission was opened against him in November when it was said he was liable to be sent to gaol. When the mill was sold early in 1795 the ‘newly built’ premises included a house occupied by the Aldred family, “the Stock-house, Warehouse, Engine-house, Fire engine, Outhouses, Garden.on the east side of Westgate Common commanding the entire and continual Stream of Water of Westgate Common Beck … the whole purposely constructed and in all Respects well calculated for carrying on the Business of Scribbling, Carding & Spinning Wool”. The mill continued in operation under new owners into the nineteenth century and in 1834 John Clarkson also a Unitarian, was employing 27 males and 8 females. Fortunately Ebenezer was assisted financially by his married elder sister Sarah (1742-1832) and went to live with her family in Sheffield.[1] The reason for his failure may be owing to a number of factors:- difficult trading conditions during the Napoleonic War, insufficient capital, or as tradition suggests money spent on the turf! Ebenezer had married in 1776 Mary Moult, daughter of the nonconformist Minister of Rotherham Chapel. (The family tree on her mother's side can be traced back to Richard Sherlle who married a Miss Linnacre in 1568). There were four children John (born in 1781), another son and two daughters Bridget, who married John Williams, and Mary. The Reverend Joseph Hunter records, “When I first knew him, which was about 1796 , he was living in Sheffield with a brother-in-law, without employment. He got some commission to America from the Sheffield merchants, but this did not succeed. At last, when more, perhaps than fifty years of age, he became a minister, and had care of a chapel in the Peak of Derbyshire. There he lived in a kind of solitude, became dreamy and wild; laid hold on prophecies; saw Napoleon in the Book of Revelation”. Thomas Ward who met him in August 1812 described him as “a tall venerable man with grey hairs floating over his shoulders (who) several months ago, sailed in a boat on the Thames, clothed in a white garment, denouncing woe to the Metropolis. He has also published a book of prophetic conjectures, which are so extravagant as, combined with his eccentric conduct, to induce a supposition that he is beside himself”. The prophecies were published under the title of “The Little Book”. (London 1811). I found that there was a copy in the British Library and arranged to see it. In the front of Ebenezer Aldred's ‘Little Book’ a printed obituary has been enclosed taken from page 769 of the Mortality Depository Volume XVII for December 1822. It reads as follows:- 1822 October 25 at Sheffield, where he had resided for the last two years of his life the Rev. Ebenezer Aldred at the advanced age of 77. His remains were interred in the burial ground belonging to the Unitarian Chapel at that place on November 1. The following extract from the funeral sermon has been kindly furnished by Dr Phillips by whom it was delivered. The text of the discourse was taken from Acts Chapter ix v. 24. The ‘Little Book’ had a sub-title ‘See the tenth Chapter of Revelation or a close and brief elucidation of the 13th, 14th, 15th, 16th, 17th and 18th Chapters of Revelation by Eben-Ezer’ And a text :- “Hitherto the Lord has helped us”. 1 Samuel vii 12. Ebenezer interpreted these six chapters of Revelation as a single prophecy as a disaster to come.[4] So concerned was he that he posted at Tideswell the Manuscript to the Prime Minister Mr Addington on March 24 1803.[5] Ebenezer in his introduction did not claim that his elucidation was written in ‘elegant diction or grammatical accuracy’ but it was his attempt to tell the truth. Ebenezer drew on the book of Daniel as well as Revelation. He wrote, “The present kingdoms of Europe are unquestionably represented by the feet and toes of the great image which Nebuchadnezzar saw in his prophetical dream.” “The form of government which now subsists must be dissolved”. (Daniel ii 44). References to the progress of the Napoleonic War are based for instance on the animals mentioned in the biblical text. The bear was Russia greedy and gluttonous. This appears to be a reference of £6 million in gold sent to Russia in 1807. The leopard was Germany on the basis that the German Principalities appeared as many spots, although in another place he considers it might be Britain as it appears in the coat of Arms. The ‘rough goat was the king of Graecia’. Much of the interest in this Little Book is when he uses contemporary events to strengthen his arguments; at one point the National Debt, all £811,898,083, 12s 3¾ of it, is recorded! The grievous and inquisitorial impost of a 10% tax on all property is mentioned together with Sir David Dundas the raiser of taxes, ‘who shall be destroyed’ (Daniel) or as Ebenezer interprets it be, “deprived of his situation”! From Daniel he also deduced that 2,300 days were left before the sanctuary would be purged. The Jews would be restored; they alone were Unitarian. From the book of Revelation he infers that ‘there comes a smoke out of the pit’, refers to ‘submarine navigation’. “Who can see all the consequences of this discovery ..?” “Fulton, an American has already added to his boat a machine by means of which he blew up a large boat, and if by future experiments the same effect could be produced on frigates or ships of the line. Where will sailors be found to man the ships of war, when it is a physical certainty that they may every moment be blown into the air by means of a Diving boat, against which no human foresight can guard them?” There is even an intriguing interpretation that makes the letters that make up Louis in its German version of LUDOVICUS into the number of the Devil 666. L=50; u=5;D=500; O=0; 'V'=5; I=1; C=100; U=5; S=0; total 666! The book of which 4000 were printed by C. Stowen of Paternoster Row presumably at Aldred's own expense was ready to be published on February 12 1811 the day Parliament opened. However publication was held up to await the arrival of the ‘sixth king’, and delayed until February 19 1812. The selling price was 3/- each or ten books for £1. The following day the book was exhibited from a boat ‘in the middle of the river’ (i.e. a prophet standing neither on land nor water). 'R.A' [6] has written in the Little Book :- “This extraordinary instance of fanaticism was ye work of the Reverend Ebenezer Aldred”. The MS at the end is his autograph, relating to his prophetic fear on the River Thames. On the other hand Ebenezer's attitude to slavery was very much up to date:-“O my fellow Britons take a repentive view of our crimes in the massacre of millions in the East Indies and the hellish traffic in human beings to transport as beasts of burden to fill the coffers of our over- grown merchants (both of which have been sanctioned by our legislators, therefore are become national crimes.) These!! These! Very great evils call for the judgment of a God of justice. These! The numerous footnotes can also be revealing. He notes a sale of slaves to be sold in Kingston Jamaica, the good ship Liberty of Liverpool carrying slaves between the ages of fourteen and forty. “I was a witness when in America to the trial (and mutilation) of three human beings - for a small theft.” “As I was inveighing bitterly against such a horrid punishment, one of them cut me short by the following answer, ‘You an Englishman and pretend to tell us of our cruelty, go to your West Indian islands and see the wretches impaled alive’”. Elsewhere he takes William Pitt to task when the Government in 1805 purchased 5000 African negroes at £55 per head to serve as soldiers in the Leeward Islands. Pitt claimed that it was acceptable as they were already slaves in America. ‘Mr Pitt might quibble but it was a direct purchase’. He also criticised and the owners of cotton mills and woollen factories who treated their employees harshly. The conclusion is that, despite his eccentricities, Ebenezer was ‘a Good Man’ is hard to fault.
Notes
This account was compiled by Malcolm Barton in July 2007. |
|||||||||||||